Compare AI models: Hy3 vs Grok 4.7
- Hy3Tencent
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hy3 | 67/100 | 68/100 | 70/100 | 53/100 | 0/100 | 40/100 |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
256K
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.14/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.58/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
65K
60K
Completed sessions
463,530
150,529
Token share
0.02%
0.01%
Tokens
222B-97%
76B+100%
SEP 5OCT 30
SEP 5OCT 30
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
64%1.9K user-weeks
42.9%1.6K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeHy3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonHy3 vs Jamba MiniHy3·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba Mini