Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3 vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

MiniMax-M3MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
MiniMax-M3	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	83/100	55/100	92/100	50/100	21/100
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B	0/100	34/100	88/100	63/100	0/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

MiniMax

NVIDIA

Context length

262K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

MiniMax

NVIDIA

Pricing

Input

$0.30/ 1M

$0.03/ 1M

Output

$1.20/ 1M

$0.12/ 1M

Cached input

$0.06/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

190K

202K

Completed sessions

1,586,499

6,177,885

Token share

0.17%

0.33%

Tokens

2.1T-53%

4.1T+54%

SEP 5OCT 30

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

60.2%12K user-weeks

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonMiniMax-M3 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3Jamba Mini Related comparisonNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B vs Jamba MiniNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BJamba Mini