Compare AI models: Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Grok 4.5
- Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorMeta
- Grok 4.5xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor | 100/100 | 90/100 | 80/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 100/100 |
| Grok 4.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 90/100 | 26/100 | 75/100 | 33/100 | 57/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf, Audio
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.002/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.5M
864
Completed sessions
367,090,602
34,248
Token share
19.4%
0%
Tokens
239T+2,966%
169M-100%
SEP 5OCT 30
SEP 5OCT 30
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.3%57K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor vs Jamba MiniMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.5 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.5·Jamba Mini