Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs GLM-5.3
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- GLM-5.3Zhipu
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 65/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| GLM-5.3 | 85/100 | 100/100 | 30/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 100/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.22/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Output
$0.66/ 1M
$4.18/ 1M
Cached input
$0.007/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.5M
268K
Completed sessions
22,561,724
887,197
Token share
6.02%
0.1%
Tokens
74T-74%
1.3T+27%
SEP 5OCT 30
SEP 5OCT 30
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
63.1%139K user-weeks
44.8%18K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5.3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5.3 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3·Jamba Mini