GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op vs Qwen3.8 Flash

  1. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-opDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Qwen3.8 Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder72/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
1M
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$0.15/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$0.47/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
6.3K
222K
Completed sessions
54,938
2,409,003
Token share
0.02%
0.22%
Tokens
230B+100%
2.7T+326%
SEP 5OCT 30
SEP 5OCT 30
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
61.2%11K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.