GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op vs Kimi K3.1 Pro

  1. deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-opDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Kimi K3.1 ProMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
deepseek-v4.1-flash-1017-op50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder
Kimi K3.1 Pro50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder17/10092/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
Unknown
1M
Reasoning
Unknown
True
Input modalities
Unknown
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Unknown
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
Unknown
$2.00/ 1M
Output
Unknown
$10/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.20/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
6.3K
30K
Completed sessions
54,938
81,600
Token share
0.02%
0.01%
Tokens
230B+100%
178B+100%
SEP 5OCT 30
SEP 5OCT 30
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.