Compare AI models: Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Claude Haiku 4.5AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 29/100 | 46/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 64/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
200K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.00/ 1M
$0.17/ 1M
Output
$5.00/ 1M
$0.70/ 1M
Cached input
$0.10/ 1M
$0.005/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
0
4.3M
Completed sessions
39
114,366,256
Token share
0%
40.7%
Tokens
00%
502T+100%
No trend data
SEP 5OCT 30
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
69.2%413K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructClaude Haiku 4.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonClaude Haiku 4.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Haiku 4.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba Mini