Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max vs LongCat-2.5-Preview
- Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
- LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max | 88/100 | 100/100 | 25/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 91/100 |
| LongCat-2.5-Preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 57/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.006/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
118K
291K
Completed sessions
565,243
15,849,760
Token share
0.02%
0.73%
Tokens
250B-2%
9T+100%
SEP 5OCT 30
SEP 5OCT 30
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
43.5%5.4K user-weeks
62.6%2.8K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructLongCat-2.5-Preview·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba Mini